Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 IND 250 - Pratt v. Luther

Pratt v. Luther’s Empirical Analysis

1873

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
September 1927
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 1927

12 state decisions

70187318801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baulec v. New York & Harlem Railroad · Pickett v. School District No. One · Port v. Russell · Lane v. Taylor · Dinwiddie v. President of Rushville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘'Such a practice would be attended with the most dangerous and pernicious consequences. It would open the door to the grossest frauds. It would impose upon the people unjust and extortionate burdens. It would cause the people to lose confidence in and respect for those in authority. Such a practice is against every principle of law, Public policy, and sound morals.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.