45 Kan. App. 2d 430 - Vontress v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Vontress · In Re Campbell · 37 Kan. App. 2d 676 - Ludlow v. State · 34 Kan. App. 2d 157 - Hayes v. State · Barr v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Time limitations. (1) Any action under this sectionmustbebroughtioithinone year of: (i) The final order of the last appellate court in this state to exercise jurisdiction on a direct appeal or the termination of such appellate jurisdiction; or (ii) the denial of a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States supreme court or issuance of such court’s final order following granting such petition. “(2) The time limitation herein may be extended by the court only to prevent a inanifest injustice.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vontress v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.