Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 LAANN 605 - State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 1979
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1979

10 state decisions

30189319001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ober · Connors v. . the People · Macklin v. Allenberg · Brandon v. . the People · Drew v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The principle is clearly laid down by the text-writers on the subject, in a number of authoritative decisions, that the defendants can not claim separate trials as a matter of right, although they sever in their pleas, but that the court, in its discretion, may allow them to be tried separately. “There are exceptions to the rule. One, for instance, where one joint defendant has made a confession implicating both, and which the prosecution intends to offer on the trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.