45 Md. App. 378 - Baldwin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 district · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably Ricks v. State (1988), 89 Md. App. 25 - Allen v. State (1991)
2 district · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 8
Relies on Scott v. United States · State v. Frye · Belcher v. Government Employees Insurance · State v. Siegel · 13 Md. App. 444 - State v. Siegel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Whenever an order authorizing interception is entered pursuant to this subtitle, the order shall require reports to be made to the judge who issued the order showing what progress has been made toward achievement of the authorized objective and the need for continued interception. The reports shall he made at the intervals the judge requires.” (Emphasis added.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Calhoun v. State · State v. Baldwin““Section 10-408(f) was enacted so as to assure the public that notwithstanding the issuance of a wiretap order, its use would be, insofar as possible, controlled by a neutral authority, the issuing judge, and that it would continue no longer than necessary so as to minimize the intrusion into the privacy of others.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Calhoun v. State“Because the drafters of the Maryland Act so carefully tracked the federal statute ... we look to court decisions interpreting that legislation for guidance in construing the Maryland statutory language.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.