Burton v. Schildbach’s Empirical Analysis
1881
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 1902
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chesnut v. Shane's Lessee · Mechanics' & Working-Men's Mutual Savings Bank & Building Ass'n v. Allen · Parmelee v. Lawrence · Thompson v. Morgan · Mok v. Detroit Building & Savings Ass'n No. 4
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ It is objected that the receiver was not legally appointed because Schildbach was not made a party to Geller’s bill; but Sehildbach has recognized the receivership by his subsequent payments, and he should not be heard to question the appointment in this collateral way.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Skinner v. Lucas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.