Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

45 Misc. 206

In re Cunningham

New York County Courts

Decided November 15, 1904

New York County Courts · decided 1904-11-15

<p>Residence for the purpose of voting — How affected by the constitutional provision as to soldiers in service.</p> <p>The question as to the place at which an elector is entitled to vote is still, notwithstanding the provision of the Constitution of the State of New York, “ Nor the purpose of voting, no person shall be deemed to have gained or lost a residence, by reason of his presence or absence, while employed in the service of the United States,” in each case, as it was before the adoption of this provision, one of domicile or residence to be decided upon all the circumstances of the case.</p> <p>A soldier may acquire a residence in the locality in which he is placed by reason of his employment in the service of the United States.</p>

Relies on Silvey v. . Lindsay

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1904-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1967

2 district · 8 state decisions

701904191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Healey, J.

¶1This is an application for an order to compel the inspectors of election of Ward No. 6 in the city of Plattsburgh, N. Y., to convene on the second Saturday before election and place the names of Alfred Cunningham and others on the register of voters of that ward. The applicants claim to have resided one year in the State, four months in the county and thirty days in Ward No. 6, and during this time were members of the Fifth United States Infantry located at Plattsburgh barracks, N. Y. On the days provided by law for registration, the applicants appeared in person and asked that their names be placed on the register of voters. The inspectors of election refused to place their names on the register on the ground that they were members of the Fifth United Slates Infantry and by reason of this fact, could not have acquired a voting residence in Ward *207No. 6. This contention is based on the following provision of the Constitution: For the purpose of voting, no person shall be deemed to have gained or lost a residence, by reason of his presence or absence, while employed in the service of the United States.” State Const., art. II, § 3.

¶2This provision of the Constitution is aimed at the participation of an unconcerned body of men in the control through the ballot-box of municipal affairs in whose further conduct they have no interest, and from the mismanagement of which by the officers their ballots might elect, they sustain no injury. Its effect is not to disqualify such persons from gaining or losing a residence, but renders the fact of sojourn or absence impotent as evidence either to create or destroy it; in other words, presence or absence has primarily no effect upon the political status of such person.

¶3The question in each case is still as it was before the adoption of this provision of the Constitution, one of domicile or residence, to be decided upon all the circumstances of the case. Silvey v. Lindsay, 107 N. Y. 55.

¶4. The soldier may acquire a residence in the new locality. His calling the place his home, or believing it to be his home, does not legally make it such. It is not his view of the fact that governs; the facts themselves govern the question. Mere intention is not alone sufficient. It must exist, but must concur with and be manifested by resultant acts which are independent of the presence of the soldier in the new locality.

¶5It appears from the evidence produced on the part of the applicants that they have resided outside of the military reservation, within the State and Ward No. 6 of the city of Plattsburgh, during the year last past. This is in no way contradicted except by one (Tierney) who claims that the applicants admitted to him in a conversation that they had not resided outside of the military reservation for over a year. I think the proof sufficient to establish a residence in this ward for over a year last past, and, therefore, order that the board of inspectors convene and place the names of the applicants on the register list as provided by law, and that an order may be entered accordingly.

¶6Ordered accordingly.

/45/misc/206 · .json · Public domain