Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 MOAPP 598 - Leas v. Pacific Express Co.

Leas v. Pacific Express Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 1905
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Butts v. Phelps · Hill v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co. · Rosenburg v. Boyd · Nutter v. Houston · Weese v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Telephone 924. “Kansas City, Missouri, June 2, 1886. “Pacific Express Company, “Bought of George Leas, Boiler Maker, and Dealer in New and Second-PIand Machinery, Corner Delaware Street and Levee, Kansas City, Missouri, June 24, 1886: “1 crank shaft for 4x6 Eng......................$18.00 “This shaft -was shipped C. O. D., to Frank E. Wells, Eufala, Indian Territory, May 31. “Broken by Pacific Company.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.