Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1921
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“•‘Probate Minutes, December, 1900. “Tuesday, the Eleventh day of December, 1900. “255. Estate and Guardianship of ffm. Smith et al., Minors. “Max Waterman, counsel for guardianship, aslred to have his name withdrawn as counsel in the case. N. B. Smith asked to have his name entered' as counsel instead of the Max Waterman’s. John M. Smith, the guardian of said minors, having made application to the court for an order authorizing him to borrow the funds in his hands belonging to said minors amounting to the sum of about $82,000 at the rate of three per cent, per annum. “The court being fully advised in the premises: It is ordered that said guardian be authorized to borrow said sum of $82,000 at the rate of 3 per cent, per annum, and to so hold the same at said interest until the further •order of this court. “Order allowing guardian to use money of estate signed and filed. “F. K. Armstrong, Judge.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.