45 N.C. App. 367 - Kahan v. Longiotti’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2014
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of the Indiana Transportation Company · 38 N.C. App. 664 - Raintree Corp. v. Rowe · Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Thermoco, Inc. · 38 N.C. App. 81 - Ellis v. Ellis · Berman v. Herrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The issue is thus whether, after a motion to intervene, which must be accompanied by a proposed pleading, has been served upon all affected parties and the motion is granted, is service of process pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure required or is the former service of the motion and complaint pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules of Civil Procedure sufficient. We hold that an inter-venor party who is granted permission to intervene pursuant to Rule 24(b)(2) is not required to then issue a summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 but that the service pursuant to Rule 5 of the motion to intervene accompanied with the complaint is sufficient service upon the party against whom relief is sought or denied in the intervenor’s pleading and is sufficient process to acquire jurisdiction over the party if all other requirements for jurisdiction over the party are met. 6”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Except as otherwise provided in these rules, ..., every pleading subsequent to the original complaint ... shall be served upon each of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.