45 N.C. App. 96 - Triplett v. James’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
June 1999
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dixie Container Corp. of North Carolina v. Dale · Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Davidson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any purchaser of a motor vehicle who shall have suffered any loss or damage by any act of a motor vehicle dealer that constitutes a violation of this Article shall have the right to institute an action to recover against . . . the surety.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“to the people of the State of North Carolina to indemnify any person who may be aggrieved by fraud, fraudulent representation or violation by said Principal, salesmen, or representatives acting for such Principal within the scope of employment of such salesmen or representatives of any of the provisions of Article 12, Chapter 20 of the North Carolina General Statutes in the amount of $15,000 for each supplemental place of business, within this State at which motor vehicles are sold. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“any other person [damaged] in the conduct of the licensee's business.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.