State v. Ripa’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably State v. MacOn (1971), State v. Deatore (1976)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Escobedo v. Illinois · Griffin v. California · 28 Cal. 2d 699 - People v. Simmons · People v. McGee · State v. D'Adame
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * no inference can be drawn against him under the doctrine of acquiescence by silence or any other concept.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In that setting [custody], the right of a suspect to remain silent is a conspicuous and likely explanation of his silence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Needless to say, a suspect is under no duty to give a statement; on the contrary he is privileged to say nothing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Deatore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.