Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 NJL 39 - Pope v. Skinkle

Pope v. Skinkle’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
March 1952
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1952

3 state decisions

1018831890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dame v. Dame · Ham v. Kendall · Osgood v. Howard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether the building was personalty or realty would depend on the intention of the builder and land owner, if they both had the same intention, and if they had not, then it would depend on what common intent should be imputed to them in the judgment of those called to pass upon their conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.