Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 N.J. Super. 338 - Casteel v. Casteel

45 N.J. Super. 338 - Casteel v. Casteel’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
8
states following
July 1994
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently July 1994 · most notably 144 N.J. Super. 200 - D'Onofrio v. D'Onofrio (1976), 181 N.J. Super. 130 - Mastropole v. Mastropole (1981)

36 state decisions

18019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. State of North Carolina · May v. Anderson · Estin v. Estin · Sherrer v. Sherrer · People of State of New York Halvey v. Halvey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the Superior Court has jurisdiction over the custody and maintenance of the minor children of parents divorced, separated or living separate, and such children are natives of this State, or have resided five years within its limits, they shall not be removed out of its jurisdiction against their own consent, if of suitable age to signify the same, nor while under that age without the consent of both parents, unless the court, upon cause shown, shall otherwise order. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Every state is entitled to enforce in its own courts the policy of its own statutes on subjects properly the incidents of its jurisdiction, and the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution does not require otherwise unless the conflicting statute or judgment of another state is shown, on some rational basis, to have a superior basis for recognition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “* * * in no case shall the court having jurisdiction in this State over the person and custody of any minor permit such child to be removed from this State where the mother or father resides in this State and is the suitable person who should have the custody of such child for its best welfare.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.