Sharrock v. Dell Buick-Cadillac, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]hat is not to say, of course, that the due process clause of the State Constitution eliminates the necessity of any State involvement in the objected to activity. Rather, the absence of any express State action language simply provides a basis to apply a more flexible State involvement requirement than is currently being imposed by the Supreme Court with respect to the Federal provision.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Rodriguez v. Beechmont Bus Service, Inc.

2. “New York has so entwined itself into the [conduct] as to constitute sufficient and meaningful State participation____” Id. 9 . Plaintiff never stated which U.C.C. provision defendant purportedly acted under. The Jefferds case holds that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 822 F. Supp. 956 - Liberty Mortgage Banking, Ltd. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

3. “entwin[ing] itself into the debtor-creditor relationship arising out of otherwise regular consumer transactions.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Price v. U-Haul Co. of Louisiana