Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 NY2D 589 - People v. Iannone

People v. Iannone’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 875 F. Supp. 182 - Roberts v. Scully (1995), LanFranco v. Murray (2002)

4 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

14019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court must be vigilant in safeguarding the defendant’s rights to a bill of particulars and to effective discovery. Should the prosecutor decide to use an indictment which, although technically sufficient, does not adequately allow a defendant to properly prepare for trial, he may well run afoul of the defendant’s right to be informed of the accusations against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]o satisfy th[e] notice requirement [of the Sixth Amendment], the indictment must allege all the legally material elements of the charged crime and state that [the] defendant in fact committed the acts which comprise the elements. The “basic essential function of an indictment ... is simply to notify the defendant of the crime of which he stands indicted[.]””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““A person is guilty of criminal usury . when, not being authorized or permitted by law to do so, he knowingly charges, takes or receives any money or other property as interest on the loan or forbearance of any money or other property, at a rate exceeding twenty-five percentum per annum or the equivalent rate for a longer or shorter period.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.