45 Ohio App. 2d 155 - Raine v. Curry’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

21 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “`The foregoing demonstrates a lack of understanding by the officer of his mandatory statutory obligation under R.C. 2935.20 to forthwith afford to an arrested person facilities to communicate with an attorney[.] This means that facilities for communication with an attorney must be furnished immediately upon request and the officer may not delay until it suits his convenience, his paperwork is done, or slating is completed. The testimony of the officer indicates [that] he violated R.C. 2935.20 in this instance.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 94 Ohio App. 3d 684 - City of Lakewood v. Waselenchuk

2. ““Where a statute setting forth a new civil right is adopted, the General Assembly may grant a right to jury trial, but need not do so. No such right is contained in this statute [R. C. 4511.191] and no such right exists. Bright v. Curry (1973), 35 Ohio Misc. 51 .” Raine v. Curry (1975), 45 Ohio App. 2d 155, 162 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 64 Ohio App. 2d 179 - McIntyre v. Northern Ohio Properties

3. “forthwith facilities to communicate with an attorney.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 94 Ohio App. 3d 684 - City of Lakewood v. Waselenchuk