Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 Ohio App. 2d 293 - State v. Shepcaro

45 Ohio App. 2d 293 - State v. Shepcaro’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Charles A. Tabasko, Jr. v. Bernard I. Barton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “supplemental testimony taken orally by the judge from an affiant will not be admissible at a hearing to suppress unless that testimony has been recorded by a court reporter or recording equipment, transcribed and made a part of the affidavit. If it is not so recorded and transcribed, it will not be admissible at a hearing on a motion to suppress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “if taken down by a court reporter or recording equipment, transcribed, and made part of the affidavit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.