45 Ohio App. 2d 293 - State v. Shepcaro’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“supplemental testimony taken orally by the judge from an affiant will not be admissible at a hearing to suppress unless that testimony has been recorded by a court reporter or recording equipment, transcribed and made a part of the affidavit. If it is not so recorded and transcribed, it will not be admissible at a hearing on a motion to suppress.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dibble“if taken down by a court reporter or recording equipment, transcribed, and made part of the affidavit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dibble
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.