45 Ohio App. 2d 32 - State v. Shook’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"No person, knowing he is under detention or being reckless in that regard, shall purposely break or attempt to break such detention, or purposely fail to return to detention, either following temporary leave granted for a specific purpose or limited period, or at the time required when serving a sentence in intermittent confinement.” (Emphasis added.)”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 29 Ohio App. 3d 194 - State v. Smith · 81 Ohio App. 3d 706 - State v. Davis

2. “an abstract term which signifies, not a place or means of confinement, but a status”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re C.T., Unpublished Decision (1-19-2007) · State v. Turner, Unpublished Decision (12-6-2004)

3. ““When the simple word ‘detention’ is used, there may be physical restraint but it is not essential to the detention, which in its abstract form connotes merely the state or status of being detained in some form of legal custody.” Shook, supra at 35 , 74 O.O.2d at 72 , 340 N.E.2d at 425 . See, also, Stemen, supra, wherein the court held at 8 that “the fact that the defendant was not subject to any physical restraint * * * is immaterial.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 81 Ohio App. 3d 706 - State v. Davis