Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 OHIOST3D 255 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2025 · most notably 67 Ohio St. 3d 405 - State v. Evans (1993), Smith v. Ohio (1990)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 54 state decisions

30019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Chimel v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While we as a society must endeavor to deal with the scourge of illegal drugs in a quick and effective manner, we must never sanction a solution that dispenses with the constitutional guarantees and personal liberties that have made ours the most enduring government on the face of the Earth.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““* * * [N]ot all personal intercourse between policemen and citizens involves ‘seizures’ of persons. Only when the officer, by means of physical force or show of authority, has in some way restrained the liberty of a citizen may we conclude that a ‘seizure’ has occurred.” “There is nothing in the Constitution which prevents a policeman from addressing questions to anyone on the streets.” Id. at 34 (White, J., concurring).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a reasonable person in appellant's position would have believed he was free to leave at any time, prior to his actual arrest following the discovery of contraband.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.