State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2025 · most notably 67 Ohio St. 3d 405 - State v. Evans (1993), Smith v. Ohio (1990)
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Chimel v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While we as a society must endeavor to deal with the scourge of illegal drugs in a quick and effective manner, we must never sanction a solution that dispenses with the constitutional guarantees and personal liberties that have made ours the most enduring government on the face of the Earth.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent““* * * [N]ot all personal intercourse between policemen and citizens involves ‘seizures’ of persons. Only when the officer, by means of physical force or show of authority, has in some way restrained the liberty of a citizen may we conclude that a ‘seizure’ has occurred.” “There is nothing in the Constitution which prevents a policeman from addressing questions to anyone on the streets.” Id. at 34 (White, J., concurring).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams“a reasonable person in appellant's position would have believed he was free to leave at any time, prior to his actual arrest following the discovery of contraband.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. McDonald
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.