Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 Okla. 12 - Schock v. Fish

Schock v. Fish’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably Tobin v. Tobin (1923), Prowant v. Sealy (1919)

83 state decisions

4801914192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Owen v. City of Tulsa · Miller v. Cook · Lewis v. Clements · Faulkner v. Simms · Clark v. Holmes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * The true rule, and which should be recognized by-this court, is, in all cases which were cognizable only in a court of chancery, it is the duty of this court to consider the whole record, to* weigh the evidence, and, when the judgment of the trial court is clearly against the weight of the evidence, render or cause to be rendered such judgment as the trial court should have rendered.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where fraud is relied upon as the basis for equitable relief and the trial court, after hearing the evidence, finds that fraud has not been established, the appellate court will not disturb such finding, unless it is clearly against the weight of evidence.” (Overstreet v. Citizens Bank, 12 Okla. 383 , 72 Pac. 379 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““In all issues of fact joined in any court all parties may waive the right to have the same determined by a jury; in’which case the finding of the judge upon the facts shall have the force and effect of a verdict by jury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.