State v. Claypool’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2003
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sullivan · State v. Spokane · State v. Sullivan · 31 Wash. App. 403 - State v. Olson · 109 Wash. App. 325 - State v. A.M.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There, the court determined a lien that did not come due until the occurrence of a future event was not a judgment until the duty to pay arose. [ Young ] at 537 [ 723 P.2d 12 ]. Thus, the issue was whether Mr. Young's lien was a judgment. Here, there is no dispute that Mr. Claypool's financial obligations arise under the judgment against him. And there is no future occurrence that triggers his obligation to pay. Young is not then applicable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Financial obligations imposed in a judgment shall bear interest from the date of the judgment until payment, at the rate applicable to civil judgments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.