Ross v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
September 2024
most recently cited
42 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Connelly · Moran v. Burbine · Oregon v. Elstad · Marks v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he standard for 'custody' is whether, based on the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable person would feel that his freedom of movement has been restricted to a degree associated with an actual arrest”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the 'circumstances surrounding the interrogation;' and (2) 'given those circumstances, would a reasonable person have felt he or she was not at liberty to terminate the interrogation and leave.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“defer to a trial court's findings of fact as long as they are supported by competent, substantial evidence, but we review de novo a trial court's application of the law to the historical facts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.