Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 SO3D 518 - Hicks v. State

Hicks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · State v. Schopp · 970 So. 2d 312 - McDuffie v. State · 703 So. 2d 465 - Pomeranz v. State · 819 So. 2d 705 - Cox v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the reviewing court finds that there is a reasonable possibility that the discovery violation prejudiced the defense or if the record is insufficient to determine that the defense was not materially affected, the error must be considered harmful. In other words, only if the appellate court can say beyond a reasonable doubt that the defense was not procedurally prejudiced by the discovery violation can the error be considered harmless.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.