45 So. 3d 557 - Boyd v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Faretta v. California · 762 So. 2d 879 - Brooks v. State · United States v. Erskine · 617 So. 2d 291 - Rose v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant never requested self-representation. Nor is the decision to waive or assert speedy trial rights a core function which would trigger a Faretta inquiry. The decision as to whether to waive speedy trial does not require the level of skill and experience that the “core functions” of a lawyer demand. In fact, our supreme court has made clear that the client should be “involved” with such a decision.... Honoring a client’s wishes in this regard is not the same as an attorney allowing the defendant to perform a core function of the attorney’s role in the defense[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.