Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 SW2D 293 - McDaniel Bros. v. Wilson

McDaniel Bros. v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
January 2001
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2001

8 state decisions

3019311940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Behne · Gilmore v. Driscoll · Henry v. Kirby Lumber Co. · Burnett and Wife v. Ft. Worth L. P. Co. · Dorrity v. . Rapp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because of the personal interest of this witness the issue of necessity as to the several items of repairs should have gone to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.