Ganesan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 390th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery v. State · Alejandro v. State · Cockrell v. State · McKay v. State · Reed v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“commits an offense if, with intent that a capital felony or felony of the first degree be committed, he requests, commands, or attempts to induce another to engage in specific conduct that, under the circumstances surrounding his conduct as the actor believes them to be, would constitute the felony or make the other a party to its commission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex parte Garza“The State did not file a cross-appeal and the propriety of the district court's ruling is not before us,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pfeiffer v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.