Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 SW3D 649 - Lofton v. State

Lofton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wesbrook v. State · Rousseau v. State · Saunders v. State · Arevalo v. State · Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]ven if appellant by his actions has intended to prevent the arrest, this does not negate the evidence that his chosen method of doing so was to assault the arresting officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[f]rom the evidence before it, the jury could have rationally believed that appellant intended to obstruct the arrest and the force he used was incident to that intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “at the very least, recklessly caused [the police officer] to suffer a bodily injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.