Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 SW3D 77 - Cooper v. State

Cooper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

67 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Thompson v. State · Helms v. State · Grunsfeld v. State · Lyon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(3) But if the appeal is from a judgment rendered on the defendant's plea of guilty or nolo contendere under Code of Criminal Procedure article 1.15, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant, the notice must:”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “provided, however, before the defendant who has been convicted upon either his plea of guilty or plea of nolo contendere before the court and the court, upon the election of the defendant, assesses punishment and the punishment does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant and his attorney may prosecute his appeal, he must have permission of the trial court, except on those matters which have been raised by written motion filed prior to trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the body of case law construing the proviso [of Article 44.02] would prevail and still control.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.