45 Tenn. App. 487 - McDade v. McDade’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2001
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 33 Tenn. App. 27 - Savage v. Spur Distributing Co. · 25 Tenn. App. 1 - Brockett v. Pipkin · 25 Tenn. App. 144 - Baird v. McDaniel Printing Co. · 27 Tenn. App. 342 - Farmers Union Bank of Henning v. Johnson · Barnes Bros. v. Coal Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The costs of the cause are adjudged against Neil McDade and Grace Everest McDade, except those costs incident to the cross bill of Clint McDade, which are adjudged against him. The Court will retain jurisdiction of the cause for the purpose of enforcing this decree and a lien is declared on the amount due Edith and Everest McDade in favor of Eobert C. McEwan for Ms services in the matter, and a reference is hereby ordered to the Clerk and Master to determine the reasonable value of his services to date. The Master will notify all interested parties of the time and place of a hearing to determine the amount and will report his finding's to the Court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“‘ ‘ Since Everest McDade has been declared incompetent to contract with Neil McDade et al, we think it very necessary that all the rights and obligations of all the parties to this litigation be completely and fully adjudicated as soon as possible. Therefore, upon the remand of this cause the Chancellor will determine those questions expressly reserved by him in his former decree as well as all other matters necessary to adjudicate completely the rights of the parties. Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the Chancery Court of Hamilton County for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.