Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 Tex. Civ. App. 638 - Baldwin v. Polti

45 Tex. Civ. App. 638 - Baldwin v. Polti’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 1942
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 1942

17 state decisions

7019071910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a general rule that the act of an agent is the act of his principal, which is expressed in the maxim: ‘Qui facit per alium, facit per se.’ And, as there was no question as to Stewart’s agency and authority, proof of his doings, within the scope of his agency, supports the' allegation that they were the acts of the defendant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.