Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

45 Va. App. 399

Neely v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided April 12, 2005

Court of Appeals of Virginia · decided 2005-04-12

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2006

2 state decisions

Relies on 44 Va. App. 239 - Neely v. Commonwealth · 44 Va. App. 536 - In Re Barron · Neely v. Commonwealth

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-04-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Upon a Rehearing En Banc

¶2By published opinion dated November 9, 2004, a divided panel of this Court reversed the judgment of the trial court. See Neely v. Commonwealth, 44 Va.App. 239, 604 S.E.2d 733 (2004). We stayed the mandate of that decision and granted a rehearing en banc, 44 Va.App. 535, 605 S.E.2d 777 (2004).

¶3Upon rehearing en banc, it is ordered that the stay of the November 9, 2004 mandate is lifted and the judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded to the trial court for the reasons set forth in the majority panel opinion.

¶4Chief Judge FITZPATRICK, Judges BUMGARDNER, FELTON and HALEY dissent for the reasons set forth in the panel dissent. See 44 Va.App. at 244-47, 604 S.E.2d at 735-36.

¶5It is ordered that the trial court allow counsel for the appellant an additional fee of $200 for services rendered the *400appellant on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel’s costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses.

¶6This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.

/45/vaapp/399 · .json · Public domain