45 Va. App. 581 - Vilseck v. Vilseck’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pocahontas Mining Ltd. Liability Co. v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. · Chappell v. Perkins · 43 Va. App. 279 - Smith v. Smith · Video Zone, Inc. v. KF&F Properties, L.C. · Pysell v. Keck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Absent the necessity to consider extrinsic evidence, ‘appellate courts review trial court interpretations of contractual texts de novo because we have an equal opportunity to consider the words within the four corners of the disputed provision.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.