State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1907
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1971
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Payne · State v. Bailey · State v. Fair · State v. Coates · State v. Ripley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But the general rule is that the weight and credibility of the evidence in a criminal case is for the jury, and that the appellate court will not disturb the verdict where the criminatory evidence is substantial, even though it might have found the other way were the question one over which it had original jurisdiction. State v. Maldonado, 21 Wash. 653 , 59 Pac. 489 ; State v. Coates, 22 Wash. 601 , 61 Pac. 726 ; State v. Norris, 27 Wash. 453 , 67 Pac. 983 ; State v. Bailey, 31 Wash. 89 , 71 Pac. 715 ; State v. Kroenert, 13 Wash. 644 , 43 Pac. 867 ; State v. Murphy, 15 Wash. 98 , 45 Pac. 729 ; State v. Manville, 8 Wash. 523 , 36 Pac. 470 ; State v. Ripley, 32 Wash. 182 , 72 Pac. 1036 ; State v. Fair, 35 Wash. 127 , 76 Pac. 731 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Panovich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.