45 Wash. App. 321 - State v. Philips’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman · Acosta v. United States · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises Inc. · Amfac Mortgage Corp. v. Arizona Mall of Tempe, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When we were forced out of business the credibility that we had was all gone. We were, as I said, all over the press. We were not allowed to advertise. And I don't believe that there is a borrower out there that didn't know of our situation. Many of them paid their loans; as a matter of fact, the majority of them did. . . . And I believe that it had a direct effect on those that did not pay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.