45 Wash. App. 474 - State v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[A]n offender may, in the process of seeking one criminal objective, actually commit several technical offenses. The burglar may be guilty of burglary, possession of burglary tools, possession of stolen property, flight to avoid arrest, and conspiracy to commit burglary.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Hayes

2. “is an objective one that does not depend upon the offender's subjective intent, and thus, the defendant's single subjective purpose of obtaining money for narcotics did”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Hayes

3. “no substantial change in the nature of the criminal objective.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway