Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 Wash. App. 528 - State v. Payne

45 Wash. App. 528 - State v. Payne’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently April 2005 · most notably 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway (1988), State v. Copeland (1996)

3 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

200198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Schantzen · 98 Wash. 2d 507 - State v. Holland · 42 Wash. App. 78 - State v. Wood · 43 Wash. App. 340 - State v. Harp · State v. Magnan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of a kind not usually associated with the commission of the offense in question.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “without any history of similar acts or other corroborating evidence ...”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “To reverse a sentence which is outside the sentence range, the reviewing court must find: (a) Either that the reasons supplied by the sentencing judge are not supported by the record which was before the judge or that those reasons do not justify a sentence outside the standard range for that offense; or (b) that the sentence imposed was clearly excessive or clearly too lenient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.