45 Wash. App. 658 - State v. Huntley’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2000
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 92 Wash. 2d 193 - State v. Cann · 89 Wash. 2d 321 - Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Johnston · 89 Wash. 2d 256 - State v. McDonald · 102 Wash. 2d 300 - State v. Martin · 37 Wash. App. 805 - State v. Arambul
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) Subject to subsections (1) and (2) of this section, whenever a person is sentenced for a felony that was committed while the person was not under sentence of a felony, the sentence shall run concurrently with any felony sentence which has been imposed by any court in this or another state or by a federal court subsequent to the commission of the crime being sentenced unless the court pronouncing the current sentence expressly orders that they be served consecutively.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(l)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, whenever a person is to be sentenced for two or more current offenses, the sentence range for each current offense shall be determined by using all other current and prior convictions . . .. Sentences imposed under this subsection shall be served concurrently. Consecutive sentences may only be imposed under the exceptional sentence provisions of RCW 9.94A.120 and 9.94A.390(2)(f) or any other provision of RCW 9.94A.390.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“when sentences are imposed [under RCW 9.94A.400] on multiple felony offenses, other than serious violent ones, committed while the offender was not then subject to a felony conviction and an exceptional sentence is not warranted, concurrent sentences are required when the conviction,s[ 3 ] are obtained in a single or consolidated proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bates
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.