Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 Wash. App. 692 - State v. Moon

45 Wash. App. 692 - State v. Moon’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
5
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2003 · most notably 139 Ill. 2d 264 - People v. Enis (1990), 109 Wash. 2d 832 - State v. Coe (1988)

25 state decisions

110198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Lister v. United States · 37 Cal. 3d 351 - People v. McDonald · State v. Chapple · 104 Wash. 2d 412 - State v. Guloy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) where the identification of the defendant is the principal issue at trial; (2) the defendant presents an alibi defense; and (3) there is little or no other evidence linking the defendant to the crime.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “whether (1) the witness qualifies as an expert, (2) the opinion is based upon an explanatory theory generally accepted in the scientific community, and (3) the expert testimony would be helpful to the trier of fact.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.