Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 Wash. App. 728 - State v. Griffith

45 Wash. App. 728 - State v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2009

18 state decisions

70198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Ohio v. Roberts · Dutton v. Evans · Barber v. Page · Smith v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantially met before a statement is demonstrated to be reliable.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Arguably, the competency issue can be raised for the first time on appeal on the basis that the showing of unavailability is constitutionally mandated when the declarant witness, whose testimony is to be used against the defendant, is not produced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The victim's competency to testify at the time of trial is not dispositive as to her competency at the time she made the statements and, hence, their admissibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.