45 Wash. App. 832 - State v. Rabon’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 63 Wash. 2d 664 - Lenci v. City of Seattle · 57 Wash. 2d 106 - City of Bellingham v. Schampera · 92 Wash. 2d 106 - State Ex Rel. Schillberg v. Everett District Justice Court · 102 Wash. 2d 271 - State v. Theilken · 92 Wash. 2d 717 - City of Bellevue v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'"The statute, as well as the ordinance, in the case at bar, is prohibitory, and the difference between them is only that the ordinance goes farther in its prohibition— but not counter to the prohibition under the statute. The city does not attempt to authorize by this ordinance what the Legislature has forbidden; nor does it forbid what the Legislature has expressly licensed, authorized, or required. * * * Unless legislative provisions are contradictory in the sense that they cannot coexist, they are not to be deemed inconsistent because of mere lack of uniformity in detail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“attempts to authorize what the Legislature has forbidden or . . . forbid [s] what the Legislature has expressly licensed, authorized, or required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.