Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 Wis. 2d 20 - State v. Kramer

45 Wis. 2d 20 - State v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably 47 Wis. 2d 668 - State v. Bergenthal (1970), 80 Wis. 2d 122 - State v. Mendoza (1977)

29 state decisions

250196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · 31 Wis. 2d 110 - Lock v. State · 24 Wis. 2d 527 - State v. Nutley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Different crimes and different degrees of the same crime may be joined in one information, indictment or complaint.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In a criminal case, at least so far as the pleading is concerned, no reasonable grounds exist for not including in the same indictment offenses committed by the same defendant, even though they differ from each other, vary in degree of punishment and were committed at different times . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Community Prejudice. If a defendant who is charged with a felony files his affidavit that an impartial trial cannot be had in the county, the court may change the venue of the action to any county where an impartial trial can be had. . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.