Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 Wis. 2d 340 - Lovesee v. Allied Development Corp.

45 Wis. 2d 340 - Lovesee v. Allied Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
5
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2004 · most notably Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co. (2004), 54 Wis. 2d 424 - Payne v. Bilco Co. (1972)

4 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

2301970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Walker v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. · 19 Wis. 2d 54 - Presser v. Siesel Construction Co. · Grana v. Summerford · 34 Wis. 2d 688 - Bruss v. Milwaukee Sporting Goods Co. · Metcalf v. Consolidated Badger Co-Operative

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[Y]ou will determine how much or to what extent each person named in the question is to blame for the accident and considering the conduct of the persons named in the question considered as a whole, you will determine whether one made a larger, equal or smaller contribution than the others.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the nature or character or respects of negligence ... bear a relationship to cause,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to what extent each party is to blame for the accident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.