45 Wis. 2d 550 - York v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably 157 Wis. 2d 332 - Lievrouw v. Roth (1990), State v. Ramsdell (1971)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 21 Wis. 2d 147 - State v. Tuttle · Ernst v. Greenwald · Waddell v. State · State v. Schmear · 43 Wis. 2d 488 - Deja v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““So, in Wisconsin the general rule has been adopted that ‘The admission of opinion evidence rests largely in the discretion of the court.’ “Certainly, it is permissible for a witness to give a shorthand rendition of a total situation or a description of collective facts without his testimony colliding with a rule excluding opinions. A witness is generally permitted to testify about a personal experience or knowledge of a sensation, although the witness’ answer is his opinion of the matter. The accuracy or strength of the testimony is to be tested by cross-examination.” 1”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Detective Behrendt testified that he had questioned a person identified to him as Earl David Bowie in the interrogation room of the detectives' assembly at 10 a.m. on March 22, 1968, and had obtained a confession from him. Detective Cornell, although he did not testify to hearing defendant Bowie confess to Detective Behrendt, did testify that he had seen Detective Behrendt questioning defendant Bowie at the detective bureau on March 22, 1968, at about 10 a.m."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Woodson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.