Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2010
2 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oyler v. Boles · Green v. United States · 8 Smith & H. 177 - Girdley v. State · State v. Vandenburg · People v. Caton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not itself a federal constitutional violation” so long as “the selection was [not] deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Albury v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.