Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 450 A2D 419 - United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2016

18 state decisions

901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Jencks v. United States · Palermo v. United States · United States v. Augenblick · Goldberg v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) who within the government is responsible for the loss or destruction; (2) whether the loss or destruction was deliberate, done for an improper purpose, negligent or inadvertent; (3) the extent to which the government has promulgated and generally followed procedures designed to preserve evidence ...; (4) whether the applicable procedures were followed in the particular case; and (5) what steps were taken by the government to locate or reconstruct the missing evidence when its loss was discovered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[w]here the loss [of producible statements] is a result of bad faith or gross negligence, the trial court must exclude the witness' testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “the policy of the statute, the quest for truth, is undercut as much by governmental negligence as by intentional acts of destruction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.