Anthony Perrucci v. Martin A. Gaffey’s Empirical Analysis
450 F.2d 356 · 1971
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell v. Hood · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Powell v. McCormack · Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Williams v. Rhodes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the allegation was limited to `expenses and loss' incurred by plaintiff in bringing the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.