Marder v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis
450 F.3d 445 · 2006
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 25 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 146 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'n (2010), United States v. Corinthian Colleges (2011)
15 federal appellate · 25 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 106 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on 2 Cal. 4th 1254 - Bank of the West v. Superior Court · Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc. · 69 Cal. 2d 33 - Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co. · Branch v. Tunnell · United States v. Ritchie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 146 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] court may consider evidence on which the complaint `necessarily relies’ if: (1) the complaint refers to the document; (2) the document is central to the plaintiff’s claim; and (3) no party questions the authenticity of the copy attached to the 12(b)(6) motion,”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“may assume [an incorporated document's] contents are true for purposes of a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Generally, the scope of review on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is limited to the contents of the complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.