Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 450 F. Supp. 721 - Hardison v. Weinshel

450 F. Supp. 721 - Hardison v. Weinshel’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 43 Wis. 2d 265 - Knoll v. Klatt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] contingency fee arrangement has an element of risk for any attorney ... [and] imposes on the attorney the duty to carry his client's claim through litigation, if necessary....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In 7 Am. Jur 2d, Attorneys at Law § 221 (1963), entitled "Abandonment of Cause," it is stated that an attorney, who without justifiable cause, withdraws from a case before its termination loses all right to compensation for services rendered, as does an attorney who is engaged on a contingent fee basis and who fails to perform the contingency. On the other hand, the attorney may recover the reasonable value of services rendered where he [or she] withdraws with the client's consent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “nullified any claim arising under the retainer contract,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.