450 F. Supp. 97 - Nouse v. Nouse’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2012
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1702 · 18 U.S.C. § 610 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1339 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Cort v. Ash · Griffin v. Breckenridge · Hagans v. Lavine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To come within the legislation a complaint must allege that the defendants did (1) “conspire . . .(2) “for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws.” It must then assert that one or more of the conspirators (3) did or caused to be done, “any act or furtherance of the object of [the] conspiracy,” whereby another was (4a) “injured in his person or property,” or (4b) “deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Totaro v. Lyons“under one of the substantive statutes to which section 1343 relates.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.