450 F. Supp. 2d 220 - Brooks v. Chappius’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Parratt v. Taylor · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Daniels v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] supervisory official's receipt of a letter complaining about unconstitutional conduct [was] not enough to give rise to personal involvement on the part of the official.” 450 F.Supp.2d at 225 . Moreover,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Young v. Choinski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.